From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kleinsleep Products, Inc. v. McCrory Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2000
271 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued February 10, 2000.

April 3, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence, the defendant McCrory Corporation a/k/a McCrorys appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated December 31, 1998, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to strike its sixth affirmative defense and denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Hofheimer Gartlir Gross, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Scott R. Kipnis, David L. Birch, and Erika L. Jenkins of counsel), for appellant.

Gennett, Kallmann, Antin Robinson, New York, N.Y. (Stanley W. Kallmann, Paul A. Tumbleson, and Mark Antin of counsel), for respondents.

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

This action was commenced after the appellant filed a petition in bankruptcy. Commencement of the action violated the automatic stay provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code (see,11 U.S.C. § 362[a][1]). Contrary to the appellant's contention, however, "the stay did not deprive the court of jurisdiction over the action commenced but merely suspended the proceedings" (International Fid. Ins. Co. v. European Am. Bank, 129 A.D.2d 679 ). While acts taken in violation of the bankruptcy stay may be voided under appropriate circumstances "where they have prejudiced the other parties to the bankruptcy proceeding" (International Fid. Ins. Co. v. European Am. Bank, supra, at 679-680; see, Baker v. Bloom, 146 A.D.2d 859 ), no such prejudice occurred here.

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Kleinsleep Products, Inc. v. McCrory Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2000
271 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Kleinsleep Products, Inc. v. McCrory Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KLEINSLEEP PRODUCTS, INC., ETC., et al., respondents, v. McCRORY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 296

Citing Cases

Yen-Ching Chen v. Dickerson

For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the commencement of this proceeding was also a nullity. The…

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Ranalli

The appellant's contention that this action was void ab initio is without merit. Although the filing of a…