From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kleinschmidt v. Sacramento Cnty.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 1, 2022
2:22-cv-1889-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1889-EFB (HC)

11-01-2022

CHARLES KLEINSCHMIDT, Petitioner, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent.


ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. To properly commence this action, petitioner must either pay the required filing fee or file an application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). The court will not issue any orders granting or denying relief until this action has been properly commenced.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to either submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or the filing fee in the amount of $5.00. Failure to comply with this order will result in a dismissal of this action.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the court's form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner.


Summaries of

Kleinschmidt v. Sacramento Cnty.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 1, 2022
2:22-cv-1889-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Kleinschmidt v. Sacramento Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES KLEINSCHMIDT, Petitioner, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-1889-EFB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)