From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kleinman v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 10, 2023
3:22-cv-00407-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Feb. 10, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00407-LRH-CLB

02-10-2023

GEORGE KLEINMAN and SHERRI KLEINMAN, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a National banking corporation, and DOES 1-50, Defendants.

Kelly H. Dove (NV Bar No. 9036) Jennifer L. McBee (NV Bar No. 9110) Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Bradley Paul Elley (NV Bar No. 658) Attorney for Plaintiffs


Kelly H. Dove (NV Bar No. 9036)

Jennifer L. McBee (NV Bar No. 9110)

Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Bradley Paul Elley (NV Bar No. 658)

Attorney for Plaintiffs

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)

LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), and George Kleinman and Sherri Kleinman (collectively, “Plaintiffs”, and together with Wells Fargo, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree based on the following:

WHEREAS, on December 19, 2022, Plaintiffs filed the First Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, on January 13, 2023, Wells Fargo filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”);

WHEREAS, on January 27, 2023, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss;

WHERAS, on February 1, 2023, the Parties entered into a Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadline to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (First Request) to extend the deadline for Wells Fargo to file its reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss to February 10, 2023; and

WHEREAS, due to staffing issues and to enable sufficient time for client review, Wells Fargo requested, and Plaintiffs agreed, to modestly extend the deadline for Wells Fargo to file its reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss until February 17, 2023.

NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing and subject to Court approval, the Parties agree as follows:

1. That Wells Fargo shall have until February 17, 2023, to file its reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The Court having considered the foregoing Stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. shall have until February 17, 2023 to file a reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kleinman v. Wells Fargo Bank

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 10, 2023
3:22-cv-00407-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Feb. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Kleinman v. Wells Fargo Bank

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE KLEINMAN and SHERRI KLEINMAN, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 10, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00407-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Feb. 10, 2023)