Opinion
December 3, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly determined that the complaint sufficiently stated a cause of action cognizable at law against the defendant Milton Schifenbauer individually, sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; Nolechek v. Gesuale, 46 N.Y.2d 332; Rosenberg v. Mermelstein, 116 A.D.2d 712; see also, Guggenheimer v. Ginzberg, 43 N.Y.2d 268, 275). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.