Opinion
Argued January 20, 1925 —
Decided March 16, 1925.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 100 N.J.L. 3.
For the appellants, Harry Levine.
For the respondent, Jacob L. Newman.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 8.
For reversal — PARKER, CLARK, JJ. 2.