Opinion
2:24-cv-02353-PA (JDE)
09-26-2024
PETER KLEIDMAN, Plaintiff, v. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESIDING JUSTICE ELWOOD LUI, et al., Defendants.
THE HONORABLE STEVE KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PERCY ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the operative First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 14, “FAC”) filed by Peter Kleidman (“Plaintiff”), the Order to Show Cause issued by the assigned magistrate judge (Dkt. 17), Plaintiff's Response to the Order to Show Cause (Dkt. 18, 19), the Report and Recommendation of the assigned magistrate judge (Dkt. 23, “Report”), and the Objections to the Report filed by Plaintiff (Dkt. 22, 23).
The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.