Kleftogiannis v. Inline Plastics Corp.

3 Citing cases

  1. Osei-Assibey v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.

    3:20-cv-01911 (VAB) (D. Conn. Mar. 31, 2023)

    Second, as Mr. Osei-Assibey has no personal knowledge of this other situation, any testimony offered by him would be inadmissible hearsay. See Kleftogiannis v. Inline Plastics Corp., No. 3:18-CV-1975 (VAB), 2020 WL 3036026, at *5 (D. Conn. June 5, 2020) (citing Bldg. Indus. Fund v. Loc. Union No. 3, Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, AFL-CIO, 992 F.Supp.

  2. Clinton v. Perez

    No. 3:19-cv-02010 (VAB) (D. Conn. Jul. 9, 2021)

    “Because the Court has dismissed this case's federal claim[s], the Court must conduct the discretionary inquiry required under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) to determine whether it is appropriate to maintain jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.” Kleftogiannis v. Inline Plastics Corp., No. 3:18-CV-1975 (VAB), 2020 WL 3036026, at *8 (D. Conn. June 5, 2020).

  3. McFadden v. Hobby

    No. 3:19-cv-01804 (VAB) (D. Conn. Mar. 30, 2021)

    Because the Court has dismissed this case's federal claim, "the Court must conduct the discretionary inquiry required under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) to determine whether it is appropriate to maintain jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims." Kleftogiannis v. Inline Plastics Corp., No. 3:18-CV-1975 (VAB), 2020 WL 3036026, at *8 (D. Conn. June 5, 2020). The balance of factors here weighs in favor of declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction.