From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KLAUSZ v. DILLON COS

Supreme Court of Colorado. EN BANC
Sep 18, 1989
779 P.2d 863 (Colo. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88SA443

Decided September 18, 1989.

Appeal from District Court City and County of Denver Honorable William G. Meyer, Judge.

Fogel, Keating and Wagner, P.C., Alan C. Shafner, Timothy F. Devereux, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Long Jaudon, P.C., Alan D. Avery, for Defendant-Appellee.


Appellant Romuald Klausz appeals from the trial court's order granting appellee Dillon Company, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment. Specifically, appellant argues that the trial court erred in finding section 13-21-115(3)(c), 6A C.R.S. (1987) (actions against landowners), constitutional. Contemporaneously with the announcement of this case, we have determined in Gallegos v. Phipps, No. 88SA141 (Colo. Sept. 18, 1989), that section 13-21-115 violates the equal protection provisions of the federal and state constitutions. U.S. Const. amend XIV; Colo. Const. art. II, § 25.

Accordingly, we vacate the summary judgment entered by the trial court granting summary judgment to appellee, and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion and holding in Gallegos.


Summaries of

KLAUSZ v. DILLON COS

Supreme Court of Colorado. EN BANC
Sep 18, 1989
779 P.2d 863 (Colo. 1989)
Case details for

KLAUSZ v. DILLON COS

Case Details

Full title:Romuald Klausz, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dillon Companies, Inc., a Kansas…

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. EN BANC

Date published: Sep 18, 1989

Citations

779 P.2d 863 (Colo. 1989)