Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Ctr. v. United States Bureau of Land Mgmt.

Full title: KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES…

Court: United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Nov 16, 2021

1:19-cv-1810-CL (D. Or. Nov. 16, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-1810-CL

11-16-2021

KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, et al., Federal Defendants, and MURPHY COMPANY, Intervenor-Defendant.

Michael McShane United States District Judge

ORDER

Michael McShane United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 46), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Plaintiffs filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. ECF No. 50. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9^th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 46) is adopted. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 36) is DENIED. Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED. Intervenor-Defendant's Cross Motion for

Summary Judgment (ECF No. 37) is GRANTED to the extent it aligns with BLM's motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.