From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Ctr. v. Grantham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 17, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-00439-MCE -JFM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-00439-MCE -JFM

10-17-2011

KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER, KLAMATH FOREST ALLIANCE, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, and WILDLANDS CPR, Plaintiffs, v. PATRICIA A. GRANTHAM, Klamath National Forest Supervisor; and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Defendants.

Susan Jane M. Brown SUSAN JANE M. BROWN Western Environmental Law Center FOR THE DEFENDANTS IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division DAVID B. GLAZER Natural Resources Section Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice PETER WHITFIELD Natural Resources Section Environment & Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice


IGNACIA S. MORENO

Assistant Attorney General

Environment & Natural Resources Division

United States Department of Justice

PETER WHITFIELD

Natural Resources Section

Environment & Natural Resources Division

United States Department of Justice

Natural Resources Section

Environment & Natural Resources Division

United States Department of Justice

Attorneys for Defendants

PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS'

STIPULATION AND ORDER REVISING

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING

MOTIONS HEARING

Courtroom No. 7

Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

Defendants Patricia A. Grantham and the U.S. Forest Service and Plaintiffs Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Environmental Protection Information Center, Klamath Forest Alliance, The Wilderness Society, and Wildlands CPR (the "Parties") hereby stipulate, subject to Court approval pursuant to Civil L.R. 144, to a revision of the current briefing schedule and continuation of the hearing date for the Parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. In support of this Stipulation, counsel for the Defendants represents that co-counsel has unexpectedly been called away from the office due to a death in the family. In addition, other co-counsel has a trial in the Central District of California that is scheduled to begin on December 6, 2011, and will likely continue through the hearing date on the Parties' cross-motions, currently set for December 15, 2011.

Accordingly, subject to Court approval, the Parties hereby stipulate to the following:

1. The current briefing schedule shall be adjusted as follows:

+---------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦Current Dates ¦Proposed Dates ¦ +----------------------------+----------------+-----------------¦ ¦Defendants' Opening Brief ¦October 14, 2011¦October 21, 2011 ¦ +----------------------------+----------------+-----------------¦ ¦Plaintiffs' Opposition/Reply¦November 7, 2011¦November 25, 2011¦ +----------------------------+----------------+-----------------¦ ¦Defendants' Reply ¦December 5, 2011¦December 30, 2011¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------+

2. The hearing on the Parties' cross-motions shall be continued to January 12, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., or to such other date and time as the Court determines.

3. Other than a 28-day extension of time to answer the Complaint, Stipulation and Order of April 7, 2011 [Dkt. #10], no other requests for extension have been sought in this case.

SO STIPULATED:

FOR THE PLAINTIFFS

Susan Jane M. Brown

(as authorized on Oct. 11, 2011)

SUSAN JANE M. BROWN

Western Environmental Law Center

FOR THE DEFENDANTS

IGNACIA S. MORENO

Assistant Attorney General

Environment & Natural Resources Division

DAVID B. GLAZER

Natural Resources Section

Environment & Natural Resources Division

United States Department of Justice

PETER WHITFIELD

Natural Resources Section

Environment & Natural Resources Division

United States Department of Justice

ORDER

In consideration of the foregoing Stipulation, good cause having been shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is APPROVED. It is further ORDERED that the following dates and requirements are set concerning the Parties' Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment:

October 21, 2011: Defendants will file their combined responsive papers and cross-Date:

November 25, 2011: Plaintiffs will file their reply memorandum.

December 30, 2011: Defendants will file their reply memorandum.

January 12, 2012: Motions Hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, David B. Glazer, hereby certify that I have caused the foregoing to be served upon counsel of record through the Court's electronic service system.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

David B. Glazer


Summaries of

Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Ctr. v. Grantham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 17, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-00439-MCE -JFM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Ctr. v. Grantham

Case Details

Full title:KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-00439-MCE -JFM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)