From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kizer v. Judicial Tenure Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jul 28, 2020
946 N.W.2d 249 (Mich. 2020)

Opinion

SC: 160750

07-28-2020

Thomas KIZER, Jr. and Daniel A. Burress, Plaintiffs, v. JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION, Defendant.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's March 27, 2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).

Markman, J., did not participate because of discussions he had as Chief Justice with the State Court Administrative Office concerning aspects of the dispute.


Summaries of

Kizer v. Judicial Tenure Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jul 28, 2020
946 N.W.2d 249 (Mich. 2020)
Case details for

Kizer v. Judicial Tenure Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS KIZER, JR. and DANIEL A. BURRESS, Plaintiffs, v. JUDICIAL TENURE…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Jul 28, 2020

Citations

946 N.W.2d 249 (Mich. 2020)