From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, FSB

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 24, 2024
No. 21-15667 (9th Cir. Dec. 24, 2024)

Opinion

21-15667

12-24-2024

WILLIAM KIVETT; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, Defendant-Appellant.


D.C. No. 3:18-cv-05131-WHA Northern District of California, San Francisco

Before: BYBEE and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON, [*] District Judge.

ORDER

Flagstar Bank's petition for panel rehearing, filed October 7, 2024, is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed on August 22, 2024, is withdrawn and submission is vacated pending further order of the court. The court intends to schedule oral argument on a date to be determined. With the withdrawal of the memorandum disposition filed on August 22, 2024, Flagstar Bank's petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.

The court requests simultaneous supplemental briefing by the parties addressing whether California Civil Code § 2954.8(a) is preempted by the National Bank Act under the standard and methodology described in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., 602 U.S. 205 (2024). The simultaneous briefs may not exceed 12,000 words and shall be due 30 days from the date of this order.

[*] The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.


Summaries of

Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, FSB

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 24, 2024
No. 21-15667 (9th Cir. Dec. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, FSB

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM KIVETT; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 24, 2024

Citations

No. 21-15667 (9th Cir. Dec. 24, 2024)