From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kittrell v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Nov 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 1859 (D.D.C. Nov. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12 1859

11-16-2012

Adam Troy Kittrell, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petitioner, proceeding pro se, has submitted an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.

The petitioner is a North Carolina state prisoner incarcerated at the Johnston Correctional Institution in Smithfield, North Carolina. He is challenging his state conviction following his plea of guilty. See Petition at 1, 6. Federal court review of state convictions is available under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 only after the exhaustion of available state remedies. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(1). Thereafter, "an application for a writ of habeas corpus [] made by a person in custody under the judgment and sentence of a State court . . . may be filed in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the district within which the State court was held which convicted and sentenced [petitioner] and each of such district courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain the application." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Because the petitioner has no recourse in the District of Columbia, this action will be dismissed.

A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

____________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kittrell v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Nov 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 1859 (D.D.C. Nov. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Kittrell v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Adam Troy Kittrell, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12 1859 (D.D.C. Nov. 16, 2012)