From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kittelson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 3, 2024
No. 04-22-00439-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2024)

Opinion

04-22-00439-CR

07-03-2024

Bruce Lee KITTELSON, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


DO NOT PUBLISH

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-2753-CR-C Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice, Irene Rios, Justice, Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

Appellant Bruce Lee Kittelson was convicted by a jury of murder, and the trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 12.32(a), 12.42(d), 19.02. Appellant now appeals.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and requested permission to withdraw. Counsel concludes that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Counsel provided appellant with a copy of the brief and informed appellant of his right to review the record and to file his own brief. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.) (per curiam); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Appellant subsequently requested the record and filed a pro se brief. After appellant filed a brief, the State filed its brief.

After reviewing the record, counsel's brief, appellant's pro se brief, and the State's brief, we conclude there is no reversible error and agree with counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, and appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. See Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.

No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should appellant wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals, see id. R. 68.3, and any such petition must comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4.


Summaries of

Kittelson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 3, 2024
No. 04-22-00439-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Kittelson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Bruce Lee KITTELSON, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Jul 3, 2024

Citations

No. 04-22-00439-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2024)