From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kitt v. Saul

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jan 10, 2022
3:20-cv-5485-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Jan. 10, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cv-5485-MCR-HTC

01-10-2022

DARLENE KITT, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Defendant.


ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on November 12, 2021 (ECF Doc. 18). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 18) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and this action is DISMISSED.
3. Judgement is entered in favor of the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
4. The clerk is directed to close the case file.


Summaries of

Kitt v. Saul

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jan 10, 2022
3:20-cv-5485-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Jan. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Kitt v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE KITT, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Jan 10, 2022

Citations

3:20-cv-5485-MCR-HTC (N.D. Fla. Jan. 10, 2022)