From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kitchengs v. Cintas Corp. No. 2

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 13, 2024
Civil Action 24-5746 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 24-5746

12-13-2024

ALEXA KITCHENGS v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2


KEARNEY, J.

ORDER

KEARNEY, J.

AND NOW, this 13th day of December 2024, upon considering Defendant's Motion to compel arbitration and stay (ECF 6), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF 7), for reasons in today's accompanying Memorandum, and mindful of our collective obligations under Federal Rule 1 to ensure the oft-cited purposes of arbitration by monitoring cases stayed while remaining open on our dockets awaiting contractually mandated arbitration, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion to compel arbitration and stay the case (ECF 6) is GRANTED requiring:

1. The parties proceed to arbitration consistent with the parties' Employment Agreement on the Plaintiff's claims and confirm beginning the arbitration process by no later than January 7, 2025;

2. We stay further obligations to allow the parties to proceed in contractual arbitration and then timely return to dismiss, vacate, or enforce a final award mindful extended delay in arbitration processes may run contrary to the established oft-cited purposes of arbitration and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1, requiring:

a. Plaintiff file a Notice not exceeding two pages confirming the filing of the arbitration under this Order by no later than January 8, 2025;
b. Defendant file joint status memoranda not exceeding five pages on April 10, 2025 and every thirty days thereafter confirming the parties' and arbitrator's specific progress until final award or dismissal in the arbitration;
c. Defendants file a Notice within three days of a dismissal or a final award; and,

3. Mindful the parties would likely secure a final order in this Court before July 10, 2025 absent the contractually-mandated arbitration, we grant the parties leave to show cause in memoranda not exceeding ten pages filed on or before July 24, 2025 as to why we should not dismiss this case without prejudice to a party filing a new related action solely to enforce or vacate the final arbitration award without the concerns under Rule 1 should a party be unable to earlier move to enforce or vacate.

Summaries of

Kitchengs v. Cintas Corp. No. 2

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 13, 2024
Civil Action 24-5746 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Kitchengs v. Cintas Corp. No. 2

Case Details

Full title:ALEXA KITCHENGS v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 13, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 24-5746 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 13, 2024)