From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kistler v. Doughterty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 1, 2012
No. 3:10-CV-466 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:10-CV-466

08-01-2012

JOHN M. KISTLER, JR., Plaintiff, v. CHAD DOUGHTERTY, et al., Defendants


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


(MAGISTRATE JUDGE BLEWITT)


ORDER

NOW this 1st day of August 2012, upon review of Magistrate Judge Blewitt's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 160) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 160) is ADOPTED.
(2) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 156) is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff Kistler's remaining claims against Defendants DeLuccie and Novak.
(3) Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant DeLuccie and Novak and against Plaintiff Kistler.
(4) The Clerk of Court is ordered to mark this matter as CLOSED.

_____________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kistler v. Doughterty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 1, 2012
No. 3:10-CV-466 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Kistler v. Doughterty

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. KISTLER, JR., Plaintiff, v. CHAD DOUGHTERTY, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2012

Citations

No. 3:10-CV-466 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2012)