From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kister v. Henry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 16, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-00119 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 16, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-CV-00119

01-16-2013

CHAD KISTER, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS HENRY, et al., Defendants.


JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel


ORDER

On January 10, 2013, the Court issued an Order giving Plaintiff a final fourteen (14) day period to respond to pending motions. In an abundance of caution, the Court will extend this period by SEVEN (7) DAYS. There will be no further extensions of this response time. Assuming Plaintiff does respond, Defendants shall still have FOURTEEN (14) DAYS to reply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

EDMUND A. SARGUS , JR.

UNITED-STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kister v. Henry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 16, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-00119 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Kister v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:CHAD KISTER, Plaintiff, v. CHRIS HENRY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 16, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-CV-00119 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 16, 2013)