From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KIST v. R.M. HAAN COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1908
127 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

June, 1908.


We think that the defendant was entitled to a bill of particulars with respect to permanent injuries, their nature and extent, the time when she was compelled to take to her bed and the durations thereof, the amounts paid to physicians and for drugs and medicines, and the number and character of the frequent operations which she was compelled to submit to. ( Curtin v. Metropolitan Street R. Co., 65 App. Div. 610, cited in English v. Westchester Electric R. Co., 69 id. 576; Ferris v. Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co., 116 id. 892, and authorities cited.) The order is reversed, with costs, and the motion is granted in the respects indicated, without costs. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted in the respects indicated in opinion, without costs.


Summaries of

KIST v. R.M. HAAN COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1908
127 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

KIST v. R.M. HAAN COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINA KIST, Respondent, v . R.M. HAAN COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1908

Citations

127 App. Div. 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)