From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kissi v. Mead

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Aug 20, 2009
Civil Action No. 09 1618 (D.D.C. Aug. 20, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09 1618.

August 20, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff's pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring dismissal of a prisoner's complaint upon a determination that the complaint, among other grounds, is frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted).

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution Elkton in Lisbon, Ohio, sues thirty-one defendants — mostly attorneys or law firms but also Google, Inc. — under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO") Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq. He alleges that the defendants "were or are part of a broad conspiracy that chose to take the Plaintiff's assets without compensation" and that they "sought to deprive, at one time or other, whether knowingly or unknowingly, the Plaintiff of his civil rights and his right to life, liberty and happiness because of his African origin[.]" Compl. at 4. Plaintiff seeks $1 billion in monetary damages.

The plaintiff has not stated any facts to support his claim. See 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) (defining racketeering activity). Moreover, the complaint is so lacking "an arguable basis in law and fact" as to be frivolous. Brandon v. District of Columbia Bd. of Parole, 734 F.2d 56, 59 (D.C. Cir. 1984). An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is separately and contemporaneously issued this 20th day of August 2009.


Summaries of

Kissi v. Mead

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Aug 20, 2009
Civil Action No. 09 1618 (D.D.C. Aug. 20, 2009)
Case details for

Kissi v. Mead

Case Details

Full title:DAVID KISSI, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER MEAD et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Aug 20, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09 1618 (D.D.C. Aug. 20, 2009)