Surprisingly, the majority instead concluded that the regulation is not ambiguous at all. Kisor v. Wilkie , 969 F.3d 1333, 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2020) (" Kisor III "). According to the majority at that point, "relevant" "ha[d] only one reasonable meaning"—the one proffered by the VA. Id. at 1338–1339 ("[T]he record must speak to a matter in issue, in other words, a matter in dispute.").