From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kishor v. People

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2148 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2148 EFB P

08-22-2011

CHANDRA KISHOR, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF STATE, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's August 12, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Kishor v. People

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2011
No. CIV S-11-2148 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Kishor v. People

Case Details

Full title:CHANDRA KISHOR, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF STATE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 22, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2148 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)