From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kishor v. Matteson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 23, 2021
2:21-cv-1359 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1359 JAM DB P

09-23-2021

CHANDRA KISHOR, Petitioner, v. GIGI MATTESON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 18, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 12.) Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 16.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 18, 2021, are adopted in full;
2. Petition is dismissed without leave to amend; and
3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Kishor v. Matteson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 23, 2021
2:21-cv-1359 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Kishor v. Matteson

Case Details

Full title:CHANDRA KISHOR, Petitioner, v. GIGI MATTESON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 23, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1359 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)