From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kishna v. Persons Calling Themselves Friends

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Nov 8, 2021
6:22-cv-1534-MC (D. Or. Nov. 8, 2021)

Opinion

6:22-cv-1534-MC

11-08-2021

ANITA KRISHNA, Plaintiff, v. PERSONS CALLING THEMSELVES FRIENDS, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Michael McShane, United States District Judge.

Pro se plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). The Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), must screen applications to proceed IFP and dismiss any case that is frivolous or malicious, or fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The Court is unable to make out any viable claim for relief in any of the over 50 pages of filings attached to the complaint. Plaintiff's handwritten complaint is largely illegible. To the extent the Court can read the handwriting, the Court cannot make out any allegations leading to any claim against any Defendant, named or unnamed. As Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim, it must be dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kishna v. Persons Calling Themselves Friends

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Nov 8, 2021
6:22-cv-1534-MC (D. Or. Nov. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Kishna v. Persons Calling Themselves Friends

Case Details

Full title:ANITA KRISHNA, Plaintiff, v. PERSONS CALLING THEMSELVES FRIENDS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Nov 8, 2021

Citations

6:22-cv-1534-MC (D. Or. Nov. 8, 2021)