refusing to address appellant's contention that trial court should have conducted an evidentiary hearing, because appellant failed to raise issue below
Summary of this case from State v. JonesPet. Docket No. 166.
July 24, 2000.
Denied.
Reported below: 131 Md.App. 342, 749 A.2d 174.
refusing to address appellant's contention that trial court should have conducted an evidentiary hearing, because appellant failed to raise issue below
Summary of this case from State v. JonesFull title:Kishel v. Jacobs
Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland
Date published: Jul 24, 2000
See Jacobs v. Flynn, 131 Md. App. 342, 353, 749 A.2d 174, cert. denied sub nom. Kishel v. Jacobs, 359 Md. 669…
Veytsman v. New York PalaceIn Maryland, there remains no cause of action "for damages against the owner of a tavern for injuries to…