From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kishbach v. Digugliemo

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 3, 2006
C.A. No. 06-692 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2006)

Opinion

C.A. No. 06-692.

April 3, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW, THIS 3RD DAY OF April 2006, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, and after noting that no objections to the Report were filed by Petitioner within the applicable time limits, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. This Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254, is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. section 2241(d);

3. Based upon the Magistrate Judge's determination that the within petition should be transferred to another venue, Petitioner has failed to show a denial of any constitutional right, thus a certificate of appealablity shall not be issued; and

4. If in its possession, the Clerk of Court shall transmit the original record to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kishbach v. Digugliemo

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 3, 2006
C.A. No. 06-692 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Kishbach v. Digugliemo

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD KISHBACH v. DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 3, 2006

Citations

C.A. No. 06-692 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2006)