From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kish v. City of Oak Park

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 7, 2017
SC: 156409 (Mich. Nov. 7, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 156409

11-07-2017

JUDY KISH and JOYCE BANNON, Individually and as Representatives of a class of similarly-situated persons and entities, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF OAK PARK, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

156499(24) Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices COA: 336880
Oakland CC: 2015-149751-CZ

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before November 28, 2017.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 7, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Kish v. City of Oak Park

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Nov 7, 2017
SC: 156409 (Mich. Nov. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Kish v. City of Oak Park

Case Details

Full title:JUDY KISH and JOYCE BANNON, Individually and as Representatives of a class…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Nov 7, 2017

Citations

SC: 156409 (Mich. Nov. 7, 2017)