From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kiser v. West Virginia

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Sep 21, 2022
Civil Action 3:22-CV-125 (GROH) (N.D.W. Va. Sep. 21, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:22-CV-125 (GROH)

09-21-2022

JEREMY KISER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

GINA M. GROH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Currently before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) entered by United States Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on July 27, 2022. ECF No. 7. Therein, Magistrate Judge Trumble recommends that this Court dismiss the Petitioner's Petition without prejudice. The Court finds this matter is now ripe for review.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court must conduct a de novo review of the magistrate judge's findings where objection is made. However, the Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge to which no objection is made. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and of a petitioner's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28.U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91,94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Objections to Magistrate Judge Trumble's R&R were due within fourteen plus three days of service. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). The R&R was mailed to the Petitioner by certified mail on July 27, 2022. ECF No. 7. It was received by the Petitioner on August 1, 2022. ECF No. 9. To date, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, this Court reviews the R&R for clear error.

Upon careful review and thoughtful consideration, it is the opinion of this Court that Magistrate Judge Trumble's R&R [ECF No. 7] should be, and is hereby, ORDERED ADOPTED for the reasons more fully stated therein. Therefore, the Petitioner's § 2254 Petition [ECF No. 1] is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to TERMINATE as MOOT any outstanding Motions. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to transmit a copy of this Order to the pro se Petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested, at his last known address as reflected upon the docket sheet.


Summaries of

Kiser v. West Virginia

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Sep 21, 2022
Civil Action 3:22-CV-125 (GROH) (N.D.W. Va. Sep. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Kiser v. West Virginia

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY KISER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia

Date published: Sep 21, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:22-CV-125 (GROH) (N.D.W. Va. Sep. 21, 2022)