Opinion
2:21-cv-04757-CJC (GJS)
12-16-2021
DOUG KISAKA, Plaintiff v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Defendant.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CORMAC J. CARNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all other documents, pleadings, and motions filed and lodged in this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 26, “Report”]. Objections to the Report were due by no later than December 6, 2021 [see Dkt. 25], but no Objections have been filed. The Court, however, has considered Plaintiff's motion filed on December 8, 2021 [Dkt. 27] to the extent that it addressed and/or objected to any matter set forth in the Report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has stated any objection through the above-noted motion.
Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: Defendant's motion to dismiss [Dkt. 10] is GRANTED; the Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.