From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirtdoll v. Heimgartner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jan 26, 2018
CASE NO. 17-3093-SAC (D. Kan. Jan. 26, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. 17-3093-SAC

01-26-2018

BRYON JAMES KIRTDOLL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By its Memorandum and Order entered on October 31, 2017, the Court denied the petition and declined to issue a Certificate of Appealability.

On January 5, 2018, petitioner submitted a Notice of Appeal (Doc. #12), and on January 23, he submitted a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. #16). The Court has examined the motion and finds petitioner lacks the financial resources to pay the $505.00 appellate fees.

IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COURT ORDERED petitioner's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. #16) is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: This 26th day of January, 2018, at Topeka, Kansas.

S/ Sam A. Crow

SAM A. CROW

U.S. Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Kirtdoll v. Heimgartner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jan 26, 2018
CASE NO. 17-3093-SAC (D. Kan. Jan. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Kirtdoll v. Heimgartner

Case Details

Full title:BRYON JAMES KIRTDOLL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Jan 26, 2018

Citations

CASE NO. 17-3093-SAC (D. Kan. Jan. 26, 2018)