From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirschner v. Biritz

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 25, 2003
843 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 5D02-3012.

Opinion filed April 25, 2003.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Edwin P.B. Sanders, Judge.

Steven J. Kirschner of Steven J. Kirschner, P.A., Winter Park, pro se.

David P. Lister of Sams, Martin, Lipsky, Lister Kaufman, P.A., Miami Lakes, for Appellees.


The issue on appeal is whether an attorney who represents a plaintiff in a personal injury action pursuant to a contingent fee agreement, and who withdraws from representation prior to the occurrence of the contingency (recovery), retains the right to compensation?

Florida law reflects that where the withdrawal is upon the attorney's own volition, the attorney forfeits his right to compensation unless the client's conduct makes continued representation either legally impossible or would cause the attorney to violate an ethical rule of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. See Faro v. Romani, 641 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1994); Kay v. Home Depot, Inc., 623 So.2d 764 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). In both Faro and Kay, the attorney was deemed to have lost his right to compensation after withdrawing from representation due to a dispute with the client concerning whether the client should accept a settlement offer.

In the instant case, the trial court found, and the record contains competent substantial evidence establishing, that the attorney filed a motion to withdraw due to serious disagreements with the client over the handling of the case. The attorney tired of what he perceived to be a "problem client" and initiated the process of moving to withdraw from representation. Had counsel been discharged by his client without cause, he would have been entitled to compensation under the express terms of the contingent fee agreement. However, when counsel prepared a motion to withdraw after having suggested to his client that he may wish to find other counsel, his withdrawal was voluntary and resulted in the forfeiture of his right to compensation. See Kocha Jones, P.A., v. Greenwald, 660 So.2d 1074 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The decision of the trial court denying recovery of attorney's fees is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kirschner v. Biritz

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 25, 2003
843 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Kirschner v. Biritz

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN J. KIRSCHNER, P.A., Appellant, v. RONALD BIRITZ, ET AL., Appellees

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 25, 2003

Citations

843 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Forthuber v. First Liberty Ins. Corp.

As we have previously held, when an attorney is employed on a contingency basis, unless he is discharged by…