From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirsch v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 3, 1939
256 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

February 3, 1939.

Present — Martin, P.J., O'Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; O'Malley, J., dissents and votes to affirm.


Judgment reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that no actionable negligence on the part of the defendant was proved. (See Winckler v. City of New York, 129 App. Div. 45; Balzer v. City of New York, 254 id. 772; affd., 279 N.Y. 742; Reutlinger v. City of New York, 255 App. Div. 848.)


Summaries of

Kirsch v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 3, 1939
256 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Kirsch v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL KIRSCH, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1939

Citations

256 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Weisfeld v. City of New York

In our opinion, plaintiff failed to establish any actionable negligence on the part of the defendant. (Cf.…

Leone v. City of New York

As matter of law, upon this record, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover. ( Reutlinger v. City of New…