From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirkpatrick v. McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 14, 2016
Case No. CV 14-8084 JFW (SS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-8084 JFW (SS)

06-14-2016

DANIEL KIRKPATRICK, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. \\ \\ \\ \\

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on counsel for Petitioner and Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: June 14, 2016

/s/_________

JOHN F. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kirkpatrick v. McDowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 14, 2016
Case No. CV 14-8084 JFW (SS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Kirkpatrick v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL KIRKPATRICK, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 14, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 14-8084 JFW (SS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2016)