From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirkpatrick v. Erie Indem. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 15, 2012
C.A. No. 09-119 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2012)

Opinion

C.A. No. 09-119 Erie

02-15-2012

CHARLES KIRKPATRICK, Plaintiff, v. ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant.


District Judge McLaughlin


ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, SEAN J., J.

This matter is before the Court upon Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a).

In all material respects, the record and the issues presented in the parties' summary judgment motions in this action are identical to those raised in Stanislaw, et. al. v. Erie Indemnity Company, No. 07-1078 Erie, a case in which Plaintiff Charles Kirkpatrick is also an opt-in plaintiff. On this date, February 15, 2012, a Memorandum Opinion and Order was issued in Stanislaw wherein both Plaintiffs' and Defendant's motions for summary judgment in that action were denied. That Memorandum Opinion and Order is hereby incorporated by reference and, for the reasons stated therein, Plaintiff's and Defendant's motions for summary judgment in the instant case are similarly each DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge
cm: All parties of record. ____


Summaries of

Kirkpatrick v. Erie Indem. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 15, 2012
C.A. No. 09-119 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Kirkpatrick v. Erie Indem. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES KIRKPATRICK, Plaintiff, v. ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 15, 2012

Citations

C.A. No. 09-119 Erie (W.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2012)