Kirkland v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Calloway v. State

    860 So. 2d 900 (Ala. Crim. App. 2002)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that the circuit court correctly recognized that, given the limited scope of this Court’s remand order, the court did not have jurisdiction to rule on a motion the defendant filed on remand

    Calloway's sentence was a single sentence of 30 years' imprisonment and, thus, could not be split pursuant to § 15-18-8. See Kirkland v. State, [Ms. CR-00-2494, February 1, 2002] 850 So.2d 1259 (Ala.Crim.App. 2002). Therefore, we must remand this case to the circuit court for it to conduct another sentencing hearing and to resentence Calloway.

  2. Hall v. State

    223 So. 3d 977 (Ala. Crim. App. 2016)   Cited 14 times
    Recognizing that merely because a statute is written in mandatory terms does not make that statute jurisdictional

    13A–12–281 or of the trial court's improper imposition of the fine in § 13A–12–281, or by being alerted to the trial court's failure to impose the fine in § 13A–12–281 by the State, and remanding for the imposition, correction, or setting aside of the fine regardless of whether the issue of the fine had been raised by the State or by the defendant at the trial level: Sistrunk v. State , 109 So.3d 205 (Ala.Crim.App.2012) ; Hinkle v. State , 86 So.3d 441 (Ala.Crim.App.2011) ; Mathews v. State , 74 So.3d 478 (Ala.Crim.App.2011) ; Holloway v. State , 995 So.2d 180 (Ala.Crim.App.2008) ; Hollaway v. State , 979 So.2d 839 (Ala.Crim.App.2007) overruled on other grounds, Wells v. State , 93 So.3d 155 (Ala.Crim.App.2011) ; S.T.E. v. State , 954 So.2d 604 (Ala.Crim.App.2006) ; O'Callaghan v. State , 945 So.2d 467 (Ala.Crim.App.2006) ; Tinker v. State , 932 So.2d 168 (Ala.Crim.App.2005) ; Freeman v. State , 839 So.2d 681 (Ala.Crim.App.2002) ; Phelps v. State , 878 So.2d 1202 (Ala.Crim.App.2002) ; Kirkland v. State , 850 So.2d 1259 (Ala.Crim.App.2002) ; Poole v. State , 846 So.2d 370 (Ala.Crim.App.2001), overruled on other grounds, Ex parte Lightfoot , 152 So.3d 445 (Ala.2013) ; Spooney v. State , 844 So.2d 615 (Ala.Crim.App.2001) ; Harris v. State , 826 So.2d 897 (Ala.Crim.App.2000) ; Williams v. State , 794 So.2d 441 (Ala.Crim.App.2000) ; Ricketson v. State , 766 So.2d 981 (Ala.Crim.App.2000) ; Wooden v. State , 822 So.2d 455 (Ala.Crim.App.2000) ; Myrick v. State , 787 So.2d 713 (Ala.Crim.App.2000) ; Lewis v. State , 794 So.2d 1241 (Ala.Crim.App.2000) ; Bonner v. State , 835 So.2d 234 (Ala.Crim.App.2000) ; Stanberry v. State , 813 So.2d 932 (Ala.Crim.App.2000) ; Laster v. State , 747 So.2d 359 (Ala.Crim.App.1999) ; Davis v. State , 760 So.2d 64 (Ala.Crim.App.1999) ; Douglas v. State , 740 So.2d 485 (Ala.Crim.App.1999) ; Perry v. State , 741 So.2d 467 (Ala.Crim.App.1999) ; Forte v. State , 747 So.2d 925 (Ala.Crim.App.1999) ; Robinson v. State , 747 So.2d 348 (Ala.Crim.App.1999) ; Nix v. State , 747 So.2d 351 (Ala.Crim.App.1999) ;

  3. Conner v. State

    899 So. 2d 295 (Ala. Crim. App. 2002)

    The trial court is directed to vacate its order resentencing the appellant, and that court is directed to impose a legal sentence, the minimum of which is 30 years in prison. See, e.g., Foster v. State, 844 So.2d 625 (Ala.Crim.App. 2002); Kirkland v. State, 850 So.2d 1259 (Ala.Crim.App. 2002). The trial court is also directed to apply the mandatory assessments for a conviction pursuant to § 13A-12-211, Ala. Code 1975, for the unlawful sale of a controlled substance.