From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirkland v. Sandlin

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Mar 10, 2011
2011 Ark. 106 (Ark. 2011)

Opinion

10-1059

Opinion Delivered March 10, 2011

Appeal from the Washington County Circuit Court, No. CV 2008-4144-4, Hon. Mary Ann Gunn, Judge, Rebriefing Ordered.


Appellant Reagen Craig Kirkland appeals from the circuit court's order finding a boundary by agreement with respect to property between Kirkland's home and the home of appellees, J. Scott Sandlin and Allison C. Sandlin, husband and wife. Kirkland argues on appeal that the circuit court erred in (1) failing to find that the agreement as to the boundary line was the product of an unconscious mutual mistake, which was corrected by Kirkland; and (2) failing to find that Kirkland was entitled to possession of the disputed area and that the Sandlins should have been ejected from that area. Due to deficient briefing, however, we are precluded from reaching the merits of the appeal at this time.

Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i) (2010) makes clear that "[t]he addendum must include" all "related briefs, concerning the order, judgment, or ruling challenged on appeal." A review of the instant record reveals several trial briefs relied on by the circuit court, but omitted from Kirkland's addendum. We must therefore order rebriefing.

Because Kirkland has failed to comply with our rules, we order him to file a substituted brief, which complies with our rules, within fifteen days from the date of entry of this order, pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3). W e further encourage appellate counsel, prior to filing the substituted brief, to review our rules and Kirkland's substituted brief to ensure that no additional deficiencies are present. We further note that, if after the opportunity to cure the deficiencies, Kirkland fails to file a complying abstract, addendum, and brief within the prescribed time, the judgment or decree may be affirmed for noncompliance with the rule. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3).

Rebriefing ordered.


Summaries of

Kirkland v. Sandlin

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Mar 10, 2011
2011 Ark. 106 (Ark. 2011)
Case details for

Kirkland v. Sandlin

Case Details

Full title:Reagen Craig KIRKLAND, Appellant, v. J. Scott SANDLIN and Allison C…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 10, 2011

Citations

2011 Ark. 106 (Ark. 2011)

Citing Cases

Van Mullins v. State

While we have noted the above-mentioned deficiencies, we encourage Mullins's counsel to review Rule 4-2 in…

Scamardo v. State

After service of the substituted brief, abstract, and addendum, the State shall have an opportunity to revise…