From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirkel v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1931
236 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

June, 1931.


Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and complaint dismissed, with costs. The notice of intention to commence the action served upon the corporation counsel, pursuant to chapter 572 of the Laws of 1886, failed to describe sufficiently and definitely the place of accident, and, therefore, does not comply with the statute. ( Casey v. City of New York, 217 N.Y. 192; Purdy v. City of New York, 193 id. 521; Tynan v. City of New York, 223 id. 596; Kroin v. City of New York, 177 App. Div. 738.) Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kirkel v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1931
236 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Kirkel v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MINNIE KIRKEL, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1931

Citations

236 App. Div. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)