From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KIRKALDY v. RIM

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 29, 2004
689 N.W.2d 228 (Mich. 2004)

Opinion

No. 122143.

November 29, 2004.


SC: 122143, COA: 225735, Wayne CC: 98-839111-NH

By order of May 22, 2003, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decisions in Grossman v. Brown (Docket No. 122458) and Halloran v. Bhan (Docket No. 121523). On order of the Court, the opinions having been issued on July 20, 2004, 470 Mich 593 (2004), and 470 Mich 572 (2004), the application is again considered, and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the defendants' argument that the statute of limitations was not tolled by the filing of the plaintiffs' defective affidavit of merit and that, as a result, they are entitled to dismissal with prejudice. See Geralds v. Munson Healthcare, 259 Mich App 225 (2003).

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.


Summaries of

KIRKALDY v. RIM

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 29, 2004
689 N.W.2d 228 (Mich. 2004)
Case details for

KIRKALDY v. RIM

Case Details

Full title:MARY KIRKALDY and WILLIAM KIRKALDY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CHOON SOO…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Nov 29, 2004

Citations

689 N.W.2d 228 (Mich. 2004)