Opinion
22-1191
03-20-2023
JUSTIN FRANKLIN KIRK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONSTELLIS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.
Charity C. Emeronye Swift, Stephen Christopher Swift, SWIFT &SWIFT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P.L.L.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. G. Bethany Ingle, Lauren M. Bridenbaugh, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: March 16, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00146-CMH-JFA)
ON BRIEF:
Charity C. Emeronye Swift, Stephen Christopher Swift, SWIFT &SWIFT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, P.L.L.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant.
G. Bethany Ingle, Lauren M. Bridenbaugh, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM:
Justin Franklin Kirk appeals from the district court's orders denying his motion to amend his complaint and granting summary judgment in favor of Constellis, LLC, in Kirk's civil action. We have reviewed the record included on appeal as well as the parties' briefs and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kirk v. Constellis, LLC, No. 1:21-cv-00146-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 2021; Jan. 20, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED