From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirby v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION
Jun 22, 2015
Cause No. 2:14-cv-252-WTL-MJD (S.D. Ind. Jun. 22, 2015)

Summary

noting that "the ALJ discussed both the objective tests that the VA performed and the conclusions that the VA's doctors reached"

Summary of this case from Belluomini v. Berryhill

Opinion

Cause No. 2:14-cv-252-WTL-MJD

06-22-2015

WILLIAM J. KIRBY, JR., Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Complaint for Judicial Review. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

SO ORDERED: 6/22/15

/s/_________

Hon. William T. Lawrence, Judge

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana
Copies to all counsel of record via electronic notification


Summaries of

Kirby v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION
Jun 22, 2015
Cause No. 2:14-cv-252-WTL-MJD (S.D. Ind. Jun. 22, 2015)

noting that "the ALJ discussed both the objective tests that the VA performed and the conclusions that the VA's doctors reached"

Summary of this case from Belluomini v. Berryhill
Case details for

Kirby v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. KIRBY, JR., Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 22, 2015

Citations

Cause No. 2:14-cv-252-WTL-MJD (S.D. Ind. Jun. 22, 2015)

Citing Cases

Busz v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Listing 1.02 required a gross anatomical deformity and an inability to perform fine and gross movements…

Belluomini v. Berryhill

(Compare R. 307-407 (Ex. 1F) (medical evidence on which the VA relied), with R. 24-28 (ALJ discussion of…