From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kipp v. Stanford

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jun 17, 2020
949 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Summary

In Kipp, the district court denied defense counsel's motion for mistrial that was based on plaintiff's counsel's closing arguments.

Summary of this case from Andersen v. Khanna

Opinion

No. 18-2232

06-17-2020

Natalie KIPP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas STANFORD, M.D., Defendant-Appellee.

Pressley Henningsen and Benjamin P. Long of RSH Legal, P.C., Cedar Rapids, for appellant. Jennifer E. Rinden, Robert D. Houghton, and Nancy J. Penner of Shuttleworth & Ingersoll, Cedar Rapids, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

Natalie Kipp appeals the district court order granting Douglas Stanford a new trial. AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kipp v. Stanford

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jun 17, 2020
949 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

In Kipp, the district court denied defense counsel's motion for mistrial that was based on plaintiff's counsel's closing arguments.

Summary of this case from Andersen v. Khanna
Case details for

Kipp v. Stanford

Case Details

Full title:NATALIE KIPP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOUGLAS STANFORD, M.D.…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Jun 17, 2020

Citations

949 N.W.2d 249 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Duitsman v. Afzal

We consider "the severity and pervasiveness of the misconduct, the significance of the misconduct to the…

Andersen v. Khanna

The Andersens assert this court recently affirmed a grant of a new trial where the district court initially…