From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinzie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 9, 1997
696 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-0489

Opinion filed July 9, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Richard Eade, Judge; L.T. Case No. 92-15650CFA.

Richard L. Rosenbaum of Law Offices of Richard L. Rosenbaum, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Affirmed. Although no Nelson inquiry was conducted on Appellant's motion to discharge counsel, Appellant waived this objection by failing to pursue it or otherwise alert the court that a pro se motion had been filed. See Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), approved, Hardwick v. State, 521 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 1988). In any event, any error is harmless, as the evidence of guilt is overwhelming and Appellant had opportunities to advise the court of his dissatisfaction with counsel, or otherwise raise the issue, but failed to do so. Rather, he proceeded to trial with counsel and without objection, raising it only on appeal after an adverse verdict.See Parker v. State, 570 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990);Kott v. State, 518 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Compare Dunn v. State, 640 So.2d 201 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (court's failure to rule treated as denial where pro se defendant did everything possible to secure a ruling). We also affirm as to all other issues raised.

STONE, C.J., WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kinzie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 9, 1997
696 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Kinzie v. State

Case Details

Full title:TONTI KINZIE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 9, 1997

Citations

696 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Tomas v. State

Under these circumstances, appellant waived his right to have the trial court conduct a hearing under Nelson…

Soltis v. State

However, Appellant took no steps to bring his motion to the court's attention despite having the opportunity…