From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinstle v. Comm'r of Intenal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 16, 2021
No. 22070-21 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 16, 2021)

Opinion

22070-21

09-16-2021

James Kinstle Petitioner v. Commissioner of Intenal Revenue Respondent


ORDER

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge.

It has come to the Court's attention that the p properly executed in that it does not bea the original practice before this Court.

The foregoing considered, it is

ORDERED that petitioner shall, on or befre (not electronic) a Ratifcation of Petition beaing an o in which petitioner states, if such be the case, that peti ratify and afrms the fling of said document. It is fur

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is dir a frm which ma be used by petitioner fr purposes

1


Summaries of

Kinstle v. Comm'r of Intenal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 16, 2021
No. 22070-21 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Kinstle v. Comm'r of Intenal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:James Kinstle Petitioner v. Commissioner of Intenal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Sep 16, 2021

Citations

No. 22070-21 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 16, 2021)