Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.

Full title: RAY KINSMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION…

Court: California Court of Appeals, First District, Third Division

Date published: Jul 16, 2007

No. A093424 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 16, 2007)

Opinion

RAY KINSMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant. A093424, A093649 California Court of Appeal, First District, Third Division July 16, 2007

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. 308646

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

BY THE COURT:

The court orders the opinion filed herein on June 20, 2007 modified as follows:

On page 10, in the first full paragraph, after the third sentence, insert the following sentence: “As we have discussed, he also presented evidence from which a jury could infer Unocal knew or should have known his exposure to asbestos was hazardous.”

This modification does not alter the judgment. Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.