From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinser v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
CASE NO. CV 11-0718-RGK(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 11-0718-RGK(PJW)

10-11-2011

MICHELE KINSER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,

AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

R. GARY KLAUSNER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kinser v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 11, 2011
CASE NO. CV 11-0718-RGK(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Kinser v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

Case Details

Full title:MICHELE KINSER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV 11-0718-RGK(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Wolfe

a toilet, does not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."); Caldwell v. Cabarrus Cnty.…

King v. Quigley

s a toilet, does not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."); Caldwell v. Cabarrus Cty.…