From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinsella v. New York Central Railroad Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 14, 1919
186 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Summary

In Kinsella v. New York Central R.R. Co. (186 App. Div. 856) the deceased was injured while cleaning a car standing in the freight yard at Canandaigua, N.Y. This car had been billed for its home port outside this State, and was so going directly, except for the interruption of the journey as aforesaid. It was held that deceased at time of injury was engaged in interstate commerce.

Summary of this case from Gehan v. New York Central Railroad Co.

Opinion

March 14, 1919.

Visscher, Whalen Austin, for the appellant.

Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General [ E.C. Aiken, Deputy Attorney-General, of counsel], Robert W. Bonynge, counsel to State Industrial Commission, and Philip J. O'Keefe, for the respondents.


The deceased was an employee of the New York Central Railroad Company. He was engaged in cleaning a Seaboard Air Line car standing on a track in a freight yard of his employer at Canandaigua, N.Y., when his clothes caught fire and he received such burns that he died. The car in question had recently made a journey from Brooklet, Ga., to Amsterdam, N.Y., with a cargo of melons. Having been unloaded, it was billed out of Amsterdam as an empty, on a home route card via Canandaigua, to Potomac Yard, Va. It arrived at Canandaigua on July 20, 1915, and there stood on track awaiting delivery to the Pennsylvania Railroad Company. It was during this temporary suspension of its journey that the accident occurred. On the day following the accident it was picked up by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and continued on its travels, homeward bound beyond the limits of the State. The car was making an interstate journey, and the deceased who cleaned it was at the time engaged in interstate commerce. ( Delk v. St. Louis San Francisco R.R., 220 U.S. 580; North Carolina Railroad Co. v. Zachary, 232 id. 248; Chicago, Rock Island Railway v. Wright, 239 id. 548.) Therefore, no award for this accident should have been made.

The award should be reversed and the claim dismissed.

All concurred, except JOHN M. KELLOGG, P.J., dissenting.

Award reversed and claim dismissed.


Summaries of

Kinsella v. New York Central Railroad Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 14, 1919
186 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

In Kinsella v. New York Central R.R. Co. (186 App. Div. 856) the deceased was injured while cleaning a car standing in the freight yard at Canandaigua, N.Y. This car had been billed for its home port outside this State, and was so going directly, except for the interruption of the journey as aforesaid. It was held that deceased at time of injury was engaged in interstate commerce.

Summary of this case from Gehan v. New York Central Railroad Co.
Case details for

Kinsella v. New York Central Railroad Co.

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1919

Citations

186 App. Div. 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
175 N.Y.S. 363

Citing Cases

Gehan v. New York Central Railroad Co.

" The "running slips" or the "way bill" which accompanied the cars evidently constituted directions to…

Smith v. Salt Lake Utah Railroad Corporation

Thus, their interlude of intrastate quality had ceased and the train had assumed an interstate character.…