From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinsale Ins. Co. v. Ruff Constr.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 2, 2023
C22-1045 TSZ (W.D. Wash. May. 2, 2023)

Opinion

C22-1045 TSZ

05-02-2023

KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. RUFF CONSTRUCTION, INC.; and JOSE FRANCISCO MORALES OLGUIN, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge:

(1) Defendant Jose Francisco Morales Olguin's motion, docket no. 36, to force plaintiff Kinsale Insurance Company (“Kinsale”) to amend its complaint to join Trinity Sheet Metal, Inc. (“Trinity”) as a defendant, is DENIED. In this matter, Kinsale seeks declaratory judgment concerning its duties under Commercial General Liability Policy No. 0100007580-8 (the “CGL Policy”) and Commercial Excess Liability Insurance Policy No. 0100007578-8 (the “Excess Policy), both of which were issued to defendant Ruff Construction, Inc. (“Ruff”). Compl. at ¶¶ 4.29, 4.41, & 6.1-6.5 (docket no. 1). Olguin does not assert that Trinity is an insured under either the CGL Policy or the Excess Policy. Rather, Olguin presents evidence that Trinity is an insured under a different excess policy issued by Kinsale, i.e., Policy No. 0100062097-3 (the “Trinity Policy”). See Ex. 1 to Moore Decl. (docket no. 37-1 at 2). Olguin, however, makes no showing that this litigation involves the Trinity Policy or that Trinity is a necessary or “required” party with respect to the CGL Policy or the Excess Policy. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 19(a)(1). Moreover, Olguin has not established that any justiciable case or controversy exists with respect to any indemnification potentially owed by Trinity to Ruff pursuant to their 2016 contract, see Ex. 2 to Moore Decl. (docket no. 37-2), or coverage that might be owed by Kinsale to Trinity under the Trinity Policy. To the extent that a dispute later arises between Trinity and Ruff or between Trinity and Kinsale, the rulings in this case will not affect the ability of Trinity, Ruff, Kinsale, or Olguin to commence a different lawsuit.

(2) In light of Kinsale's notice of voluntary dismissal, docket no. 40, the entry of default against Ruff, see Minute Order at ¶ 2 (docket no. 34), is VACATED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to effectuate Kinsale's notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice of all claims against Ruff. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

(3) The remaining parties, i.e., Kinsale and Olguin, shall show cause within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Minute Order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Order requiring Joint Status Report (“JSR”) signed on September 29, 2022, docket no. 9, as amended by subsequent rulings extending the JSR deadline, see docket nos. 11, 19, & 27, & docket entry dated March 13, 2023. Absent a timely response to this Minute Order, this action shall be DISMISSED without prejudice.

(4) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of record.


Summaries of

Kinsale Ins. Co. v. Ruff Constr.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 2, 2023
C22-1045 TSZ (W.D. Wash. May. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Kinsale Ins. Co. v. Ruff Constr.

Case Details

Full title:KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. RUFF CONSTRUCTION, INC.; and JOSE…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: May 2, 2023

Citations

C22-1045 TSZ (W.D. Wash. May. 2, 2023)