Opinion
21-61867-CIV-DIMITROULEAS
11-09-2022
ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
WILLIAM P DIMITRUULEAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Supplemental Motion for Attorney's Fees Related to Responding to Plaintiff's Objection to Report & Recommendation [DE 30] (the “Motion”), filed August 29, 2022, and the October 25, 2022 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt [DE 34] (the “Report”). The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 34] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge's factual findings in the Report [DE 34] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993).
Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 34] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's reasoning and conclusions.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report [DE 34] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; and
2. Defendant's Motion [DE 30] is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED