From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinney v. Milligan

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 14, 2022
3:21-CV-132-TAV-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-CV-132-TAV-JEM

03-14-2022

MARGARET KINNEY, WILLIAM KINNEY, and SARAH E. VALDES, Appellants, v. F. SCOTT MILLIGAN, Appellee.


ORDER

THOMAS A. VARLAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This civil matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations (the “R&R”) entered by United States Magistrate Judge Jill E. McCook, on February 2, 2022 [Doc. 9]. Judge McCook recommends that the Court deny appellant's motion to set aside this Court's order dismissing this case. There have been no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72.

After a careful review of the matter, the Court agrees with Judge McCook's recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. As such, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 9]. The motion to set aside this Court's order dismissing this case [Doc. 6] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kinney v. Milligan

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 14, 2022
3:21-CV-132-TAV-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Kinney v. Milligan

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET KINNEY, WILLIAM KINNEY, and SARAH E. VALDES, Appellants, v. F…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Mar 14, 2022

Citations

3:21-CV-132-TAV-JEM (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2022)