From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinnard v. Navarro

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 31, 2023
22-cv-02534-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-02534-JSW

08-31-2023

KENNETH KINNARD, Plaintiff, v. STEVE NAVARRO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTIONS

Re: Dkt. No. 39, 40, 41

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Now before the Court for consideration are Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion filed on June 30, 2023, and Rule 19 motion for joinder filed on July 10, 2023. Plaintiff's motions were filed after the notice of appeal was filed, and this Court thus lacks jurisdiction to entertain Plaintiff's motions. Williams v. Woodford, 384 F.3d 567, 586 (9th Cir. 2002); see also Estrada v. Clines, 559 Fed.Appx. 652, 652-53 (9th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motions are DENIED for lack of jurisdiction. Defendant's motion to appoint counsel is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kinnard v. Navarro

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 31, 2023
22-cv-02534-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Kinnard v. Navarro

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH KINNARD, Plaintiff, v. STEVE NAVARRO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2023

Citations

22-cv-02534-JSW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2023)